Appendix 4.H – About Disclosure: Steps for Managing Personal Information
The implementation of certain workplace accommodations for workers with CMD depends on the information disclosed by the worker about his or her health condition. The worker may feel ambivalent about disclosing information. They may believe that disclosure will have positive consequences for their health, but they may also fear stigmatization.
To make disclosure more pragmatic, authors suggest replacing the term “disclosure” with “personal information management” (Waghorn & Spowart, 2010). Presented in the form of a plan, the management of this information (Corbière, Villotti, Toth, & Waghorn, 2014) becomes a means of effective communication between the actors involved. Therefore, it is suggested that this tool be used by the person designated to RTW coordination.
Do you want to better manage your rehabilitation or vocational rehabilitation disability files and ensure good social support for the workers concerned?
We suggest a management plan designed in seven steps (Table H.1). Although it was designed for the work reintegration of workers with a severe mental disorder (Corbière et al., 2014), it can also be applied to CMDs (and even MSDs) with a few adjustments (e.g., steps 1 to 4), and be used as soon as the RTW is decided. The objectives and examples are provided for your information. It is up to you to adapt it to the worker concerned for a healthy and sustainable RTW.
Table H.1 ─ Objectives and issues of the seven stages of personal information management (adapted from Corbière et al., (2014)
Steps | Objectives | Examples of questions to ask |
---|---|---|
Step 1: Background |
This step makes it possible, even before the personal information management plan is designed, to consider various sources and types of information about the worker. |
|
Step 2: Personal goals and interests |
Assess whether the worker has established career interests and preferences. |
|
Step 3: Personal strengths and resources |
Highlight the worker’s strengths and resources. |
|
Step 4: Sensitive information |
Highlight CMD-related items (e.g., a diagnosis, symptoms) and other information that may have discredited the worker in the workplace. This also includes an assessment of how the worker has dealt with these negative experiences. |
|
Step 5: Constraints and difficulties at work |
Reframe the terms associated with the CMD into job constraints or difficulties that the employer, immediate supervisor, or others in the organization will understand |
|
Step 6: Agreement on the terms to be used to describe work constraints or difficulties |
Reach agreement on what terms will be used to describe the difficulties at work and under what circumstances. These can be formal situations (e.g., the first day of RTW) or informal (e.g., social events with co-workers). |
|
Step 7: Workplace accommodations and natural supports |
Identify workplace accommodations and natural supports in the organization that could help the worker feel more comfortable doing their job. This assessment can be done more than once and at different key or opportune times. |
|
References:
Corbière, M., Villotti, P., Toth, K. et Waghorn, G. (2014). La divulgation du trouble mental et les mesures d’accommodements de travail : deux facteurs du maintien en emploi des personnes aux prises avec un trouble mental grave. L’Encéphale, 40(S2), S91-S102.
Waghorn, G., & Spowart, C. E. (2010). Managing personal information in supported employment for people with psychiatric disabilities. In C. Lloyd (Ed.), Vocational rehabilitation and mental health (pp. 201-210). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Notes:
Ambivalence is a “normal”, common and necessary reaction to the process of decision and change. To learn more about coaching an ambivalent person through a choice: Miller, W. R., & Rollnick. S. (2012) Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. New York, U.S.A: Guilford press.